Friday, January 27, 2006

One rule for one....


Why is it that the banks tells us to ignore emails asking for us to tell them our account details, secret question answers and other personal details, but get p***ed off when they telephone you out the blue and you refuse to answer their verification questions?

It's happened a lot recently and it annoys them when you say they could be anyone.

Lack of Common Sense Rating 5.0
Only cos it's fun f**king with the heads of call-centre staff.

Comments:
hehe. funny
I'm glad to know I'm not the only person to have got into an argument with a call centre person over those 'verification details'.
One of my (least) favourites is,
call centre drudge: "what's your phone number?"
Ironic customer (me): "It's whatever you dialled to come through to me"
ccd: But you have to tell me, its for verification purposes
ic: but you just dialled it
ccd: no I didn't the computer dialled it
ic: well its the number on your screen
ccd: but its for verification purposes, to prove who you are
ic: well you might be any tom dick or harry
ccd at this point gets confused and irate and the conversation goes down hill. Chuckling doesn't do much to calm them down either.

Another old chestnut:
ccd: What's your date of birth?
ic: What's yours?
The my don't like that much.

And they really hate this one:
ccd: Look, mister, if you don't tell me then I can't talk to you
ic: Not my problem.
 
You're exactly right. It's a problem I call Asymetric Authentication, and until the banks address it, they're training their customers to fall victim to pretext calls, phishing etc.

I wrote a paper about it last year, with some security guys from Denver. Surprisingly, it didn't go anywhere.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?